Briefly overview the article (max 150 words) a) Develop a sentence to respond to this question: What is the main argument in the article? What is the author/s trying to tell you about accounting? This is likely to be the lead sentence in your assignment. And develop an overview of the article. PART TWO: Critically reflect on what is positive or negative about the article from an academic perspective (max 250 words) -To critically reflect on something means to develop a way, with support, of telling us whether you agree with the article that you selected. -Identify TWO statements or ideas from Morgan (1988) that you find interesting or significant. These could for example, be statements that you strongly agree or disagree with. You will need to quote the statement or ideas. PART THREE: Identify whether, how and why this article would or would not be useful for answering a question about the culture of accounting (max 100 words) -This is asking you to focus on how Morgan (1988) would or would not help you to answer a question about accounting and culture. The ‘how’ needs reflection. This part requires you to do two things: a) What you have learnt from evaluating Morgan (1988) in relation to culture and accounting? b) Would Morgan (1988) help you to develop an argument about accounting and culture? a. If yes, how would Morgan (1988) help you to do that? b. If no, why has Morgan (1988) not helped you to make an argument about accounting and culture?