Workflow analysis aims to determine workflow patterns that maximize the effective use of resources and minimize activities that do not add value. There are a variety of tools that can be used to analyze the workflow of processes and clarify potential avenues for eliminating waste. Flowcharts are a basic and commonly used workflow analysis method that can help highlight areas in need of streamlining. In this Assignment, you select a common event that occurs regularly in your organization and create a flowchart representing the workflow. You analyze the process you have diagrammed and propose changes for improvement. To prepare: Identify a common, simple event that frequently occurs in your organization that you would like to evaluate. Consider how you would design a flowchart to represent the current workflow. Consider what metrics you would use to determine the effectiveness of the current workflow and identify areas of waste. To complete: Write a 3- to 5-page paper which includes the following: Create a simple flowchart of the activity you selected. (Review the Sample Workflow of Answering a Telephone in an Office document found in this week’s Learning Resources for an example.) Next, in your paper: Explain the process you have diagrammed. For each step or decision point in the process, identify the following: Who does this step? (It can be several people.) What technology is used? What policies and rules are involved in determining how, when, why, or where the step is executed? What information is needed for the execution of this step? Describe the metric that is currently used to measure the soundness of the workflow. Is it effective? Describe any areas where improvements could occur and propose changes that could bring about these improvements in the workflow. Summarize why it is important to be aware of the flow of an activity. Remember to include a cover page, introduction, and summary for your paper. By Day 7 of Week 8 Submit the Assignment. Note: This paper will serve as the Portfolio Assignment for the course. Resources: Huser, V., Rasmussen, L. V., Oberg, R., & Starren, J. B. (2011). Implementation of workflow engine technology to deliver basic clinical decision support functionality. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 43–61. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. In this article, the authors describe an implementation of workflow engine technology to support clinical decision making. The article describes some of the pitfalls of implementation, along with successful and future elements. Koppel, R., & Kreda, D. A. (2010). Healthcare IT usability and suitability for clinical needs: Challenges of design, workflow, and contractual relations. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 157, 7–14. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. This article points to many health information technology designs and workflow decisions that limit their value and usage. The authors also examine the structure of the conceptual relationships between HIT vendors and the clinical facilities that purchase HIT. McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14, “Nursing Informatics: Improving Workflow and Meaningful Use” This chapter reviews the reasons for conducting workflow analysis and design. The author explains specific workflow analysis and redesign techniques.